| 1 |
| Documents Found: 23 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Trophy Holdings (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492515]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Signatureglobal Resources (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492514]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Shyam Ferrous Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Recovery proceedings under Electricity Act 2003: Applicability of section 56(2)-Liability in question of the period when petitioner had been the consumer, Petition dismissed-Whether the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner after the Apex Court took the view that penalty was liable to be imposed for violati [LexDoc Id : 492513]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
Ranoson Springs (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492508]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Pratibha Buildtech (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492506]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Lloyds Line Pipes Ltd. and Ors., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Unanimous approval to scheme, Requirement of convening meeting dispensed with-Whether the application filed under section 391, section 392 and section 394 of the Companies Act 1956 read with rule 6 and rule 9 of the Companies (C [LexDoc Id : 492502]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Jyoti Knits (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492501]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Bijli Holdings (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Unanimous approval to scheme, Requirement of convening meeting dispensed with-Whether the applications filed under section 391 to section 394 of the Companies Act 1956 seeking court directions to dispense with the requirement of [LexDoc Id : 492494]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Avantha Business Solutions Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492493]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
AD2C Holdings (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 492492]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Jay Bee Properties (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Pawan Kumar Budhia and Ors.
Transfer of shares in third company pursuant an order sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation-Citing of shareholding of transferor company in third company to institute proceedings under section 397 or section 398-Whether a transferee company could cite the shareholding of a transferor company in a third company, upon the sanction of a scheme of amalgamation, as [LexDoc Id : 492499]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Law Debenture Trust Corpn. P.L.C. and Ors. vs Sakthi Sugars Ltd.
Winding up: Failure to redeem bonds on maturity date-Petition closed in view of compromise memo entered into between parties-Whether the first petitioner (acting in the capacity as a trustee for the bondholders) was entitled to initiate the petition under section 433(e), sec [LexDoc Id : 492510]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2015 |
Rahul Gandhi and Ors. vs Subramanian Swamy and Ors.
Summoning of accused on ground of prima facie case: Modus operandi adopted by petitioners evidencing a criminal intent-Deep scrutiny of facts required at the charge stage, Petitions and pending applications dismissed-Whether the impugned order directing summoning of the petitioners as accused on the ground that the complainant had made out a prima facie case agains [LexDoc Id : 491858]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
PPI Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Registrar of Companies
[LexDoc Id : 491857]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Supermax Personal Care (P) Ltd. vs Vidyut Metallics (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Order of CLB: Removal of directors-Oral allegation made before CLB directly contrary to the statements made on oath, Appeal dismissed-Whether the order of CLB directing removal of ex-directors of first respondent and hand over charge of the company's properties and assets to its newl [LexDoc Id : 491861]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Horse Shoe Capital vs Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd. and Ors.
Appointment of alternative director-Nominee-Petitioner seeking appointment of an alternate director in place of nominee director subject to the provisions of Section 161 of the Companies Act, 20 [LexDoc Id : 561250]
|
CLB |
2015 |
S.J. Coke Industries (P) Ltd. Etc. vs Central Coalfields Ltd. Etc.
Refund of excess amount: Excess amount realised already refunded to many other parties-No document placed on record in support of plea of undue enrichment, Benefit not deniable to petitioners on ground of parity with petitioner of another case-On the issue of refund of excess amount payable to the writ petitioners, the Supreme Court noted that the instant case was one where a case of refund [LexDoc Id : 480394]
|
SC |
2015 |
S. Satyanarayana vs Energo Masch Power Engg. and Consulting (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Jurisdiction of special court to try offences under IPC 1860 and Companies Act 1956-Avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings-Even if a number of persons were accused of offences under a special enactment such as the Companies Act 1956 and as also the Indian Penal Code 1860 i [LexDoc Id : 479710]
|
SC |
2015 |
Worship Impex (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Manoranjana Sinh and Ors.
Application seeking impleadment: Question of financial capacity to invest not relevant for such application-Directions of CLB not emanating from application, Other applications still pending, Directions issued without a hearing, Impugned order unsustainable-The doubts raised by the first respondent about the financial capacity of first appellant to grant a loan of Rs.150 crores to second appellant did not [LexDoc Id : 482285]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Prince Kumar and Ors. vs Institute of Co. Secretaries of India and Ors.
Internal management of an association-Scope of interference by court-In matters of internal management of an association, the courts normally did not interfere, leaving it open to the association and its members to fram [LexDoc Id : 482286]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
ARG Auto Components (P) Ltd. vs Atlas Pet Plas Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 482289]
|
CLB |
2015 |
Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 476441]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd. vs B.P.L. Ltd.
Hypothecation deed not annulled when arbitral award passed on consent-Continuance of deed in spite of award, Status of appellant not changing to that of unsecured creditor, Appellant bound by approved scheme-The appellant had contended that it did not fall into the class of secured creditors, for it had initiated the arbitration proceeding and an award had [LexDoc Id : 476027]
|
SC |
2015 |
| |
| 1 |
| |
